This certainly puts into perspective the preparation — and expense — that’s goes into Bush’s trip to London. But honestly, why does he have to bring 150 national security advisors with him?
Comments and TrackBacks
And why didn’t anyone at Reuters catch the typo elsewhere in the graphic — should be 50 White House political “aides” not “aids”.
You know that saying that crime doesn’t pay? Every day it’s becoming increasingly clear to me that spam does in fact pay. As I delete comment spam after comment spam from PVRblog, I’ve noticed the products being sold are almost…
Please note that comments automatically close after 60 days; the comment spammers love to use the older, rarely-viewed pages to work their magic. If comments are closed and you want to let me know something, feel free to use the contact page!
Search
Who am I?
I'm Jason Levine, and have been keeping this site since the waning days of 1999. I'm a physician, a husband, a father, a scientist, an uncle, a photographer, and an unapologetic geek. I currently live in Washington, DC, and wear the two hats of a bioinformatics researcher and a clinical pediatric hematologist and oncologist.
And why didn’t anyone at Reuters catch the typo elsewhere in the graphic — should be 50 White House political “aides” not “aids”.
• Posted by: Laura on Nov 13, 2003, 1:50 PMThe more people he brings, the less likely protesters are going to get within visual range of him. He. Must. Be. Protected.
• Posted by: BillSaysThis on Nov 13, 2003, 10:44 PMYou know that saying that crime doesn’t pay? Every day it’s becoming increasingly clear to me that spam does in fact pay. As I delete comment spam after comment spam from PVRblog, I’ve noticed the products being sold are almost…
• Pinged by A Whole Lotta Nothing on Nov 16, 2003, 8:58 PM